Trump’s renewed demand for U.S. control over Greenland has turned a symbolic idea into a geopolitical stress test for the transatlantic alliance. By tying tariffs and economic coercion to territorial concessions, Washington is challenging not only Denmark’s sovereignty but the norms that underpin NATO’s cohesion. Such linkage between trade leverage and alliance loyalty risks blurring the boundary between partnership and pressure – a shift that could erode confidence in U.S. leadership among its closest allies.
European capitals have responded with uncommon unity, emphasizing that Greenland’s status falls under both Danish sovereignty and international law. This firmness conveys more than national resistance; it signals Europe’s growing determination to uphold a rules-based order even in the face of U.S. pressure. For diplomats and policymakers, the concern is less about control of Arctic territory and more about the precedent that coercive diplomacy sets within a system built on mutual trust.
If this approach persists, Washington may find itself undermining the very alliances essential to countering challenges from Russia and China in the Arctic and beyond. The Greenland dispute exemplifies how unilateral tactics, even under the guise of strategic necessity, can fracture collective security arrangements. What is at stake is not a piece of land, but the resilience of the transatlantic fabric that has long sustained Western stability.
Watch the full episode on PBS NewsHour.